Thoughts on “Scaling” Coworking

The power of coworking is not in the facilities, because those elements are commodities and have forever decreasing value. Scaling facility up is relatively easy…you can just throw more money at it. And despite how you might feel about funding your efforts, money is and will always be the easy part.

Culture, on the other hand – which is the glue of what holds a strong coworking community together – is difficult. Especially through fast growth, which is often desired to help achieve an end like scaling the space and the facility.

Culture is composed of norms, which can be established by anyone within that culture. They can be dictated – which tends to be the way offices are run. In coworking, something different can happen.

One of the things that fascinates me about coworking spaces is that we have the ability to provide a workspace, a context that most people are relatively familiar with, and actually REMOVE the rules for how it is “supposed” to work.

Ask yourself, “What happens in an office where nobody tells the workers how to act? How to interact? What to do? Where to go? Who to talk to?”.

There’s some chaos, but chaos is good.

I learned to Embrace the Chaos from early coworking founders like Chris Messina and Tara Hunt. Our human tendencies are to control chaos, and put things in order. By avoiding that, and allowing order to emerge a bit more organically, new behavioral patterns emerge. These patterns, in the context of coworking, are the things that our members love and subsequently, the things that the press likes to write about: collaboration & work exchange. Increased charity and giving. Better support for local industries. Happier people. Increased business foundation. Camaraderie and friendship. We’re building blank canvases for work patterns to emerge from, and I think that the work patterns that exist when nobody told them to are the most interesting and the most sustainable to practice.

Those elements don’t truly emerge until someone gets out of their way and simply lets them. Telling people to collaborate is a lousy way to have it happen, because it’s always dependent on you telling them. Creating opportunities for people to discover collaboration on their own terms creates a rolling effect that’s difficult if not impossible to stop once it starts.

I like to look at coworking and ask:

Are you contributing to the development of an ecosystem – one dependent on the health of its host – or a community – a self sustaining organism that while it may have a figurehead, could live on in other capacities without you?

All of that said…the question at hand is: what are the challenges to growing/scaling, and how do you overcome them?

The interesting thing is that these same elements that provide a very strong cultural base for a coworking community can also pose challenges as you grow. But the results of overcoming those challenges are richer than if the barriers weren’t there to overcome in the first place.

Consider this essay by Michale Lopp (of Rands in Repose). In it, he talks about a pickup hockey game played by Netscape employees every weekend for 14 years. A game with only 3 simple rules. Unwritten rules, but understood rules.

Rather than referee every game and start by reminding everyone of the rules, they just played. If someone new joined the game, and disobeyed one of the rules, it was up to one of the other players to let them know the rules, and then they could play on.

That is, until, a larger group with its own critical mass came in all at once. In one game, more arguments and fights, occurred than ever had in the history of the game.

Its not because that group was unnecessarily feisty, but because it’s much harder to grow a group that’s built on cultural norms – like the rules of the pickup game or the interactions of a coworking space – when lots of new people show up at once.

So what do we have at our disposal within our various coworking communities?

First, we have our membership. Existing membership is the foundation of your culture, not you. If they want something to change, its best to embrace the chaos and let it change, for the better. Making sure that existing members are having opportunities to build strong relationships is key, because they’ll be there to defend the cultural norms important to them.

On the Coworking Google Group, some people have made recent mention of “Town Hall” meetings and members lunches. These are excellent for building relationships because they allow coworkers to interact with each other with the context of membership but without the context of work. That means they are not worried about interrupting or otherwise inconveniencing each other.

Every time Indy Hall has deviated from a focus on helping create these contexts, and at the same time experienced a growth spurt in membership, we have had issues. Some can be small, like a noticeable increase in people who come in, put on their headphones, work all day without talking to anyone, and then going home. Others can be large, like the introduction of a disruptive member. Truly toxic things, like poorly ending collaborations and even theft, are more likely to occur when people aren’t on the same page with what to expect from one another.

If you don’t know what “normal” looks like in a given culture, how are you supposed to know if something is wrong?

When the community grows quickly but nobody is there to introduce the newbs to the cultural norms, the “hum” of a coworking space – the thing that gets most people excited but they can’t quite put their finger on – tends to decrease in volume. I’ve seen it repeatedly times, and not just at Indy Hall. I’ve seen it happen on the coworking e-mail list as it has grown from less than 100 people to over 2500.

Consider your coworking efforts like mini-societies, and consider the challenges of scaling ANY society when looking for solutions.



If you liked this, you should subscribe to Coworking Weekly.

You get one totally free email every Thursday full of the best coworking links I've found that week, along with coworking announcements & deals from around the world.

Sign up now, unsubscribe anytime.

10
Jul 2010
AUTHOR Alex Hillman
CATEGORY

coworking, indyhall

COMMENTS 5 Comments
  • Reed Gustow

    It is fascinating to read this post and remember a conversation we had while IndyHall was still on Strawberry Street, concerning this very topic of community scaling and connection. At the time, IndyHall was comfortable area-wise in the space, and there were conversations about potential other activities taking place in other spaces not physically connected. Any difficulty in making those other activities happen (money, space, administrative) were seen as secondary to the issues that would inevitably arise as the number of members grew and the space expanded (especially as the new space was then thought of as separate.) For various reasons, that was not the path taken; IndyHall did expand but into its current larger space. It is heartening to see the ongoing attention given to the aspect of community and the maintenance of its health.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alexhillman Alex Hillman

    Thanks Reed. If we miss the mark on the important aspects of community, we won't have much reason to be around!

  • http://www.facebook.com/alexhillman Alex Hillman

    Thanks Reed. If we miss the mark on the important aspects of community, we won't have much reason to be around!

  • Abc123

    “Some can be small, like a noticeable increase in people who come in, put on their headphones, work all day without talking to anyone, and then going home.”

    Perhaps they just want to be around people, but don't want to hear all the noise from the other people in the Hall.

    The problem, as I see it, as a former Indy Hall user, is that it's too loud in there. People don't always have the courtesy to go use the quiet rooms. One day, I sat next to a nimrod who was on his cell phone for 5 hours straight troubleshooting a website problem. He had no courtesy whatsoever. Didn't take notice when I put my headphones on, didn't take notice when I moved to the conference room.

    That was the last straw for me. Guess what? I never came back.

    Perhaps you should make it a policy for people to go use the quiet rooms when they have a phone call.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alexhillman Alex Hillman

    There's nothing wrong with putting on headphones, that wasn't the point. Its just an activity and a signal that tends to be associated with non-participatory members (which IS a problem). It was the lack of interaction.

    I'm bummed that you not only chose to suggest a policy anonymously, but moreover, that you didn't simply talk to that person who was annoying you and ask them to take their call from somewhere that wasn't disruptive to you. I'd be willing to bet that they would have apologized, and happily found another place to finish their call.

    We don't create policies, instead, we encourage people to act like human beings and interact on their own terms rather than rely on a policy to protect them from undesirables.

    Some days, Indy Hall is dead silent all day. Other days, its noisier. And not because anyone tells it to be one way or the other.

    Indy Hall isn't for everyone, and we recognize that. It makes the >100 people who work here on a regular basis very happy, though.

    The walls (both physical and metaphorical, regarding policies and rules) being down allows really incredible things to happen for people who are willing to take advantage of the lack of walls.

    For others, including yourself, it's a problem. I'm sorry your experience wasn't as good as you'd have liked, and would be happy to talk about it in a non-anonymous fashion.