<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do it by hand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy fioricet online without a prescription.</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy fioricet online without a prescription.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/?p=343#comment-733</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Buy fioricet....&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Buy fioricet bloghoster. Buy fioricet online that ships to missouri. Buy fioricet. Buy fioricet full information amp low prices....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy fioricet&#8230;.</strong></p>

<p>Buy fioricet bloghoster. Buy fioricet online that ships to missouri. Buy fioricet. Buy fioricet full information amp low prices&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Van Buren</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Van Buren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/?p=343#comment-732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t understand why Dreamweaver gets such a bad rap. It doesn&#039;t mess with your code, at least not that I have ever seen. And it makes so many things just one click easier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It understands the directory structure of your ftp site. I can be editing a file, I type crtl-s, then ctrl-shift-u and the page/file slides on up to the server. I don&#039;t have to switch windows, I don&#039;t have to pay attention to the working directory I am in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s great for finding my place in a page. I go to design view (ctrl-~), click on the spot I want to edit in the code and ctrl-~ again and I am there. It has buttons for selecting parent tags, code collapse and a good find and replace.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(one of my complaints about it is that it won&#039;t search ALL files, just the ones it thinks it wants to.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It validates html as you go, so you can see if you have a mistake. I can&#039;t tell you how many times I have found nesting and tag closure errors in html that was hand coded in a text editor.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The code completion saves me keystrokes all the time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s handy for finding colors. I always need to create a slightly different shade of one of the colors in my color scheme for a particular element of content...say a table row background color...and I can do that easily in DW, trying out a number of different shades til I get the one that&#039;s right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could work in homesite, notepad++, or komodo edit(my 2nd choice). After 10 years I know the html and css by heart. But it would just be inconvenient.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Dreamweaver gets such a bad rap. It doesn&#8217;t mess with your code, at least not that I have ever seen. And it makes so many things just one click easier.</p>

<p>It understands the directory structure of your ftp site. I can be editing a file, I type crtl-s, then ctrl-shift-u and the page/file slides on up to the server. I don&#8217;t have to switch windows, I don&#8217;t have to pay attention to the working directory I am in.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s great for finding my place in a page. I go to design view (ctrl-~), click on the spot I want to edit in the code and ctrl-~ again and I am there. It has buttons for selecting parent tags, code collapse and a good find and replace.</p>

<p>(one of my complaints about it is that it won&#8217;t search ALL files, just the ones it thinks it wants to.)</p>

<p>It validates html as you go, so you can see if you have a mistake. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I have found nesting and tag closure errors in html that was hand coded in a text editor.</p>

<p>The code completion saves me keystrokes all the time.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s handy for finding colors. I always need to create a slightly different shade of one of the colors in my color scheme for a particular element of content&#8230;say a table row background color&#8230;and I can do that easily in DW, trying out a number of different shades til I get the one that&#8217;s right.</p>

<p>I could work in homesite, notepad++, or komodo edit(my 2nd choice). After 10 years I know the html and css by heart. But it would just be inconvenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Van Buren</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Van Buren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/?p=343#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t understand why Dreamweaver gets such a bad rap. It doesn&#039;t mess with your code, at least not that I have ever seen. And it makes so many things just one click easier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It understands the directory structure of your ftp site. I can be editing a file, I type crtl-s, then ctrl-shift-u and the page/file slides on up to the server. I don&#039;t have to switch windows, I don&#039;t have to pay attention to the working directory I am in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s great for finding my place in a page. I go to design view (ctrl-~), click on the spot I want to edit in the code and ctrl-~ again and I am there. It has buttons for selecting parent tags, code collapse and a good find and replace.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(one of my complaints about it is that it won&#039;t search ALL files, just the ones it thinks it wants to.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It validates html as you go, so you can see if you have a mistake. I can&#039;t tell you how many times I have found nesting and tag closure errors in html that was hand coded in a text editor.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The code completion saves me keystrokes all the time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s handy for finding colors. I always need to create a slightly different shade of one of the colors in my color scheme for a particular element of content...say a table row background color...and I can do that easily in DW, trying out a number of different shades til I get the one that&#039;s right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could work in homesite, notepad++, or komodo edit(my 2nd choice). After 10 years I know the html and css by heart. But it would just be inconvenient.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Dreamweaver gets such a bad rap. It doesn&#8217;t mess with your code, at least not that I have ever seen. And it makes so many things just one click easier.</p>

<p>It understands the directory structure of your ftp site. I can be editing a file, I type crtl-s, then ctrl-shift-u and the page/file slides on up to the server. I don&#8217;t have to switch windows, I don&#8217;t have to pay attention to the working directory I am in.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s great for finding my place in a page. I go to design view (ctrl-~), click on the spot I want to edit in the code and ctrl-~ again and I am there. It has buttons for selecting parent tags, code collapse and a good find and replace.</p>

<p>(one of my complaints about it is that it won&#8217;t search ALL files, just the ones it thinks it wants to.)</p>

<p>It validates html as you go, so you can see if you have a mistake. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I have found nesting and tag closure errors in html that was hand coded in a text editor.</p>

<p>The code completion saves me keystrokes all the time.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s handy for finding colors. I always need to create a slightly different shade of one of the colors in my color scheme for a particular element of content&#8230;say a table row background color&#8230;and I can do that easily in DW, trying out a number of different shades til I get the one that&#8217;s right.</p>

<p>I could work in homesite, notepad++, or komodo edit(my 2nd choice). After 10 years I know the html and css by heart. But it would just be inconvenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/?p=343#comment-731</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use Dreamweaver, but just use the code view when I&#039;m building the layouts.  Since most of what I design is a theme or template for a CMS, the design view doesn&#039;t get used much unless I&#039;m doing an HTML email.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt;The worst thing I’ve ever seen is exporting to HTML from Microsoft Word. Just ridiculously awful results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can do one better, I actually had to fix a site generated in MS PUBLISHER.  And it wasn&#039;t created by the owner&#039;s relative either, they actually paid a &quot;designer&quot; to do it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Dreamweaver, but just use the code view when I&#8217;m building the layouts.  Since most of what I design is a theme or template for a CMS, the design view doesn&#8217;t get used much unless I&#8217;m doing an HTML email.</p>

<p>&gt;&gt;The worst thing I’ve ever seen is exporting to HTML from Microsoft Word. Just ridiculously awful results.</p>

<p>I can do one better, I actually had to fix a site generated in MS PUBLISHER.  And it wasn&#8217;t created by the owner&#8217;s relative either, they actually paid a &#8220;designer&#8221; to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/?p=343#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use Dreamweaver, but just use the code view when I&#039;m building the layouts.  Since most of what I design is a theme or template for a CMS, the design view doesn&#039;t get used much unless I&#039;m doing an HTML email.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt;The worst thing I’ve ever seen is exporting to HTML from Microsoft Word. Just ridiculously awful results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can do one better, I actually had to fix a site generated in MS PUBLISHER.  And it wasn&#039;t created by the owner&#039;s relative either, they actually paid a &quot;designer&quot; to do it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Dreamweaver, but just use the code view when I&#8217;m building the layouts.  Since most of what I design is a theme or template for a CMS, the design view doesn&#8217;t get used much unless I&#8217;m doing an HTML email.</p>

<p>&gt;&gt;The worst thing I’ve ever seen is exporting to HTML from Microsoft Word. Just ridiculously awful results.</p>

<p>I can do one better, I actually had to fix a site generated in MS PUBLISHER.  And it wasn&#8217;t created by the owner&#8217;s relative either, they actually paid a &#8220;designer&#8221; to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  dangerouslyawesome.com/2008/04/do-it-by-hand/feed/ ) in 0.35107 seconds, on May 24th, 2012 at 2:13 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2012 at 3:13 pm UTC -->
