Comments on: deconcept swfObject bug debugged! http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/deconcept-swfobject-bug/ Alex Hillman Writes Here Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:50:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: trmadol http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/deconcept-swfobject-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-72 trmadol Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:57:19 +0000 http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/26/deconcept-swfobject-bug/#comment-72 <p>dude. awesome.</p> dude. awesome.

]]> By: trmadol http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/deconcept-swfobject-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-1823 trmadol Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:57:00 +0000 http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/26/deconcept-swfobject-bug/#comment-1823 <p>dude. awesome.</p> dude. awesome.

]]> By: dangerouslyawesome http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/deconcept-swfobject-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-71 dangerouslyawesome Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:10:03 +0000 http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/26/deconcept-swfobject-bug/#comment-71 <p>Thanks for your comment on my blog, Geoff. I actually have some objects that will have streaming content...so I think i'm going to hook an additional argument in so that i can run that function only when i specify that argument(or not, as the case may be), the embedded objects with streaming content can be appropriately unloaded.</p> <p>perhaps this would be a better way to handle this for your distributed version of the script? some kind of override to turn it off, maybe?</p> Thanks for your comment on my blog, Geoff. I actually have some objects that will have streaming content…so I think i’m going to hook an additional argument in so that i can run that function only when i specify that argument(or not, as the case may be), the embedded objects with streaming content can be appropriately unloaded.

perhaps this would be a better way to handle this for your distributed version of the script? some kind of override to turn it off, maybe?

]]> By: dangerouslyawesome http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/deconcept-swfobject-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-1822 dangerouslyawesome Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:10:00 +0000 http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/26/deconcept-swfobject-bug/#comment-1822 <p>Thanks for your comment on my blog, Geoff. I actually have some objects that will have streaming content...so I think i'm going to hook an additional argument in so that i can run that function only when i specify that argument(or not, as the case may be), the embedded objects with streaming content can be appropriately unloaded.</p> <p>perhaps this would be a better way to handle this for your distributed version of the script? some kind of override to turn it off, maybe?</p> Thanks for your comment on my blog, Geoff. I actually have some objects that will have streaming content…so I think i’m going to hook an additional argument in so that i can run that function only when i specify that argument(or not, as the case may be), the embedded objects with streaming content can be appropriately unloaded.

perhaps this would be a better way to handle this for your distributed version of the script? some kind of override to turn it off, maybe?

]]> By: Geoff http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/deconcept-swfobject-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-70 Geoff Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:18:02 +0000 http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/2006/09/26/deconcept-swfobject-bug/#comment-70 <p>Oh, and I also should say: if you aren't using streaming content and ExternalInterface in your Flash movies, it's perfeclty fine to comment out that chunk of code.</p> Oh, and I also should say: if you aren’t using streaming content and ExternalInterface in your Flash movies, it’s perfeclty fine to comment out that chunk of code.

]]>